Skip to content

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@petrochenkov petrochenkov commented Apr 7, 2025

for making matching on specific diagnostic kinds non-exhaustive.

E.g. //@ dont-require-annotations:ERROR, like in the examples in this PR.

cc #139427 (comment)

Closes #132647 FYI @BoxyUwU since you've wanted this.

r? @jieyouxu

@rustbot rustbot added A-compiletest Area: The compiletest test runner A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 7, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 7, 2025

Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest

cc @jieyouxu

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Side note: parse_name_value_directive should produce an error if the parsed directive is not in fact a name-value.
Right now we accept and silently ignore some non-sensical stuff like e.g. //@edition (without a value).

@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Apr 7, 2025

Side note: parse_name_value_directive should produce an error if the parsed directive is not in fact a name-value.
Right now we accept and silently ignore some non-sensical stuff like e.g. //@edition (without a value)

#123760

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Apr 8, 2025

Side note: parse_name_value_directive should produce an error if the parsed directive is not in fact a name-value. Right now we accept and silently ignore some non-sensical stuff like e.g. //@edition (without a value).

Yeah, that's a long-standing issue that I want to fix eventually, but doesn't need to block this.

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! This is a very nice improvement for cases where there's really just unfortunate errors that are too fragile/target-dependent to match against.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Apr 8, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 8, 2025

📌 Commit d96df45 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 8, 2025
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Apr 8, 2025

After #139485 and #139489 (this) I'll make sure to include a dedicated section highlighting/explaining the recent compiletest changes in the next issue of the test infra internal blog post.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 9, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #139536) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 9, 2025
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bors r=jieyouxu

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 9, 2025

📌 Commit 1282912 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 9, 2025
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#138470 (Test interaction between RFC 2229 migration and use closures)
 - rust-lang#138628 (Add more ergonomic clone tests)
 - rust-lang#139164 (std: improve documentation for get_mut() methods regarding forgotten guards)
 - rust-lang#139488 (Add missing regression GUI test)
 - rust-lang#139489 (compiletest: Add directive `dont-require-annotations`)
 - rust-lang#139513 (Report higher-ranked trait error when higher-ranked projection goal fails in new solver)
 - rust-lang#139521 (triagebot: roll compiler reviewers for rustc/unstable book)
 - rust-lang#139532 (Update `u8`-to-and-from-`i8` suggestions.)
 - rust-lang#139551 (report call site of inlined scopes for large assignment lints)
 - rust-lang#139575 (Remove redundant words)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4911635 into rust-lang:master Apr 10, 2025
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 10, 2025
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139489 - petrochenkov:noreqann, r=jieyouxu

compiletest: Add directive `dont-require-annotations`

for making matching on specific diagnostic kinds non-exhaustive.

E.g. `//@ dont-require-annotations:ERROR`, like in the examples in this PR.

cc rust-lang#139427 (comment)

Closes rust-lang#132647 FYI `@BoxyUwU` since you've wanted this.

r? `@jieyouxu`
github-actions bot pushed a commit to model-checking/verify-rust-std that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#138470 (Test interaction between RFC 2229 migration and use closures)
 - rust-lang#138628 (Add more ergonomic clone tests)
 - rust-lang#139164 (std: improve documentation for get_mut() methods regarding forgotten guards)
 - rust-lang#139488 (Add missing regression GUI test)
 - rust-lang#139489 (compiletest: Add directive `dont-require-annotations`)
 - rust-lang#139513 (Report higher-ranked trait error when higher-ranked projection goal fails in new solver)
 - rust-lang#139521 (triagebot: roll compiler reviewers for rustc/unstable book)
 - rust-lang#139532 (Update `u8`-to-and-from-`i8` suggestions.)
 - rust-lang#139551 (report call site of inlined scopes for large assignment lints)
 - rust-lang#139575 (Remove redundant words)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-compiletest Area: The compiletest test runner A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a dont-check-error-annotations to compiletest
5 participants